FMP final evaluation
The theme and topic:
The brief assignment was to respond to Metamorphosis as a
title. I chose the creation of the world as a theme, with particular focus on
the first day – the creation of light.
The concept of light in art is something I am constantly curious especially due to its strong relevancy to my name, as Or in Hebrew means light, therefore I chose to name my project “Let There Be Light”.
The concept of light in art is something I am constantly curious especially due to its strong relevancy to my name, as Or in Hebrew means light, therefore I chose to name my project “Let There Be Light”.
While studying the subject and experimenting with ideas and
materials I have examined different light sources, bulbs and light chains. I found
out some tones created different shades and reflections while others stole the
focus from the main piece. It was a learning process during which I had to
study the basics of optics and physics and find how to make use of this
knowledge within my work.
The first stage of the project:
Once deciding that the respond to the topic will be the
creation of the world, I started looking at each of the days and responding to
it in two levels:
The first level
was as part of the whole creation where I will present each day of the creation
using the same medium (painting, sculpting, textile etc.)
The second level
was as a topic within itself. Thus, for example, on the third day on which
trees where created I chose to focus on the apple as an expression of trees and
document the process the apple is going through (in this case I chose to focus
on decay).
One of the problems I was facing during this stage was that I
got engaged with every idea and found it very difficult to leave it as an initial
idea and not going through it further and further. I had to constantly remind
myself that the first stage was only to explore different ideas and not to
produce a final product. This is a constant problem I am facing as I tend to explore
things thoroughly and it can easily affect my time planning scheme.
Once deciding to focus on the first day of creation as the
theme for my FMP I started thinking of how I would like to execute it. I had
several ideas in mind and started ruling them out until I had one firm idea to
develop from. Being fascinated by large pieces and installations, I aspired to
exhibit a big structure piece that will create a “WOW” affect and will make the
audience question the meaning of it and the idea behind it. It was only natural
to me to focus on an abstract installation but it was also very challenging because
by nature I am a highly organised person. The idea of chaos vs. order then came
to life and it has constantly represented my inner struggle.
Writing the project proposal:
I knew I wanted to produce an installation and I knew I had
to define the nature of my work but how could I do this without knowing what my
work will look like? I started exploring similar ideas and presentations online
and soon came across the concept of experimental projects where the
project itself is a process of learning and the final product can, in fact, be a
stage of the learning process that can stop at a certain point or keep evolving
forever. I decided to go along with every stage of the installation and stop
when I am happy with the result.
The main problem I faced during this stage was meeting the requirements
of the brief. Throughout the year I struggled understanding the briefs because
they were very vague but on this occasion it was nearly impossible to figure
out how to write the proposal. I eventually wrote the proposal based on my
experience and knowledge, and although it might have been “too much” for
college purposes, I am happy with the result.
The second and third stages of the project:
Due to the nature of my project and the way I chose to
document it, I approached stages 2 and 3 as one continuous unit on which I was
experimenting with materials developing my idea and showing constant
understanding of the contents we have learned through the year such as colour,
line, shapes, space, aesthetics etc.
Managing time:
Due to personal circumstances I constantly had to change my
time plan depending on fulfilling tasks on a daily basis. At the time of
writing the initial time plane I was not aware of the resources I will need to
put towards the project as well as other commitments (external exams outside of
college) but being very determined and focused I pushed myself (and sometimes
my tutors) into making decisions and commitments regarding my schedule (for
example approving use the cubicle long before anyone had an idea about the
layout of the exhibition space). I cannot thank my tutors enough for being so
patient with me!
Although my time management plan kept changing, following the steps and stages made it very easy for me to maintain my time frame and stay focus on tasks that still needed to be done. I couldn’t start a task before completing the previous one and I always made sure I have extra time to explore different approaches before committing to one (for example testing a stronger projector after the top piece was hung, something I couldn’t do before it was placed).
Although my time management plan kept changing, following the steps and stages made it very easy for me to maintain my time frame and stay focus on tasks that still needed to be done. I couldn’t start a task before completing the previous one and I always made sure I have extra time to explore different approaches before committing to one (for example testing a stronger projector after the top piece was hung, something I couldn’t do before it was placed).
Documenting the process:
Having an Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) I chose
to document my work using a video camera to ensure that my work was fluent and I
was not being distracted by having to stop, step back, take a picture, write
notes and so on. I have asked the video and photography departments for
technical advice and together we explored to options and methods of documenting
before deciding to use my mobile phone. This
form of documentation proved itself well for me, as I could comment on each
phase of my work in real time, and refer to it later when reflecting on it. I chose
not to share the full files due to size limitation but I have edited a full
video in a form of time-laps to show evidence of my work.
Assessment of research methods:
Choosing to work on an experimental project mostly meant
trying and erring while constantly assessing my work, however a deeper research
was needed. Most of my research was online, especially when I was looking into
the qualities of lights and casting of shadows. I watched numerous YouTube
videos explaining how light passes through objects, how it breaks and how it
projects when hitting different surfaces. This initial research allowed me to
decide which light source to use, the volume of the light needed to create the
affect I was trying to create and how to manipulate it to my needs. I do
believe I could have get a satisfying result without learning the basics of
physics, but there is no doubt in my mind that this research saved me a lot of
time and even some heartbreaks… using a prism and a lens, for example, is
something I wouldn’t have considered without previous research and without
using it i doubt I could get a range of light effects when using plastic
bottles.
While the internet was a great resource of knowledge for some
of the research, other things I had to see for myself: how an installation is
placed in space, how it is hung, health and safety issues that needed to be
taking into consideration and how materials can be manipulated to my
needs. I have spent a lot of time in
several museums looking at different installations, how they are placed or
hung, how they relate to other exhibits in the same space or how they are
placed if they occupy their own space. I also researched artists that focus on
light both online and in person to learn how other artists perceive light and
show it in their work.
By personally witness other artist’s work I was constantly
challenging myself. While some exhibits brought up my awareness to the process,
others arouse my curiosity about the final result. Either way, gallery visits
were an essential part of my understanding and learning process as they allowed
me to assess my idea and execute it better.
Meeting the requirements of the original brief:
Looking back onto the 3 stages of the brief, the learning
outcome and the final project I believe the outcome has met the requirements of
the brief. I managed to produce a piece I am proud of within the time frame I was
given. I have investigated the initial topic metamorphosis and responded
to it by creating a piece that constantly changes and responds to the individual
viewing it. This outcome is something I am very proud of and it has not changed
conceptually from the planning stage to the final outcome. I managed to
maintain the time frame and managed my time effectively and the final piece
matches the original proposal to explore and demonstrate how the eye can be
manipulated into seeing something different than what is presented in front of
it depending on the perspective and perception of an individual. I have
presented the relationships between chaos and order/beauty and ugly and I have
managed to maintain a very low budget.
Other conclusions:
Once setting up the space for the end of year exhibition I realised
that the space I was provided with was not very accessible for the viewers. In fact,
due to the nature of my installation and the fact that all occurrences take
place inside the cubicle it was essential that it will be located in a
space and way it could be approachable by the audience. On this current occasion, the location in the
studio the cubicle was placed the only way the audience could see the
installation was by accidently coming across it while viewing someone else’s
piece.
In the future I will keep such things in mind and will
consider this from the early stages of planning to the final stage exhibiting.

